The 2012 H-1B Season is Upon Us . . . Will This Year’s Economy Bring a Lottery? At this juncture it does not seem likely, however, as the statistics from last year show, planning for the H-1B is the key to being able to continue your work authorized status in the U.S. It need not be said, but, it is always best to seek competent immigration legal counsel to be able to find a way to legally remain in authorized work status in the U.S.

Yes, it is that time of year again! We always hear the accountants moan and groan about the approaching April 15th deadline each year but, you have to listen a bit more closely and you will hear (and see) the U.S. business immigration lawyers and attorneys manifesting their continuing distaste for the April 1st filing date for cap-subject H-1B professional and specialty occupation workers. Well, here we go again . . .

April 1st, 2012 marks the first day when prospective H-1B petitioning employers and prospective H-1B employees will be able to apply to the U.S. Department of Labor (”DOL”) for and Labor Condition Application (”LCA”) and Petition to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (”CIS”) for H-1B visa petitions for employment in the fiscal 2012-2013 year (”FY 2012″). Our advice to our H-1B employer clients continues to be that they need to think about filing H-1B petitions on (or very close to) April 1st for new and existing employees (usually international students in OPT) who will be eligible for a first-time H-1B visa to begin their employment on or after October 1st, 2012.

By way of background, each Fiscal Year (FY), Congress has mandated an annual cap of 65,000 H-1B visas for “professional and specialty occupation workers” who possess the equivalence of a U.S. Bachelor’s Degree. There are also an additional 20,000 H-1B visas available for individuals who possess the U.S. Master’s Degree or other advanced degrees from U.S. Colleges or Universities.

Some cases are not subject to the cap. It continues to be the case that H-1B visa petitions filed on behalf of current workers who have been counted previously against the H-1B visa cap are not included in the annual cap established by Congress. Additionally, pursuant to the Chile and Singapore Free Trade Agreement, 6,800 H-1B visas are available exclusively to Chile and Singapore Nationals. The Singapore/Chile numbers reduce the total allotment of H-1B visas available each fiscal year to 58,200.

For many years, our office has assisted international students who had to deal with the “cap-gap” issue. We also assist employers with E-Verify applications so that they can offer international students who are working for them in Optional Practical Training (OPT) a 17 month STEM extension.

In 2008 there was a regulation that gave some assistance to international students in the U.S. who applied for H-1B in their OPT period. At that time, a regulation was promulgated that provided “cap-gap” relief for F-1 students with pending H-1B petitions. For example, F-1 student visa holders who received work authorization in Optional Practical Training (OPT) were permitted to extend the authorized period of stay and work authorization as long as they have received approved H-1B visas prior to the expiration of the OPT.

Also, many Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (”STEM”) students continue to use the STEM extension as a way to have the time they need to petition in the appropriate H-1B cycle. However, to get the STEM extensions, the employer needs to be enrolled in E-Verify.

For the last three (3) fiscal years, the H-1B allotment actually lasted for almost eight to nine months. This past year, the H-1B allocation lasted until the end of November. However, in some years past, the H-1B allotment was actually exhausted within three (3) days of the H-1B visas becoming available. This required the CIS to conduct a “lottery” and only one of three visas submitted was accepted for processing by the CIS. Those were scary times for individuals and companies seeking H-1Bs.

It is likely that the demand for H-1B visas this fiscal year may be greater than it was for last year. We keep hearing that “economic recovery” is on the way. For this reason, we continue to advise our H-1B employers to consider filing on April 1st, or as close to April 1st as possible.

Employers Feel the VIBE . . . Look Out For A New Validation Instrument for Business Enterprises (”VIBE”).

CIS announced in its several recent stakeholders meetings that it will continue to use a new web-based tool called the Validation Instrument for Business Enterprises (”VIBE”). The VIBE program is purportedly designed to enhance the speed and accuracy for the adjudication of certain employment-based immigrant and nonimmigrant petitions.

The VIBE Program uses public information and previously accumulated data by third party provides to validate data about the organizations that file petitions for the temporary and permanent employment of foreign national workers in the U.S.

The VIBE Program allows CIS to electronically “ping” databases. One such database is Dun & Bradstreet (”D&B”). The D&B database contains information about the petitioner organization including, but not limited to:

1. Business activities, such as type of business (North American Industry Classification System code), trade payment information and status (active or inactive);

2. Financial standing including sales volume and credit standing;

3. Number of employees including onsite and globally;

4. Relationships with other entities including foreign affiliates;

5. Status, for example, whether it is a single entity, branch, subsidiary or headquarters;

6. Ownership and legal status, such as LLC, partnership or corporation;

7. Company executives;

8. Date of establishment as a business entity; and

9. Current physical address.

The idea is that a CIS adjudicator will consider the information submitted by the H-1B petitioner and also compare that information to the information that they glean from the VIBE database.

Since the VIBE database is not fully populated, it is likely that H-1B petitions will continue to be met with requests for evidence (”RFEs”), when the H-1B petitions are submitted to the CIS. The receipt by an employer of an RFE is likely to cause delays in processing of the H-1B (even when the cases are submitted with premium processing requests.

As an aside, the CIS also announced that it is working on an electronic registration for H-1B employers to attempt to more streamline the process and to avoid the “run on cap-subject H-1Bs” that has occurred in prior years.

The CIS announced a proposed rule that would establish a system which will allow an H-1B employer to submit an electronic registration prior to the submission of the H-1B. The idea is behind the registration is that before April 1st, the CIS will be able to predict how many visas are being demanded by cap subject H-1B employers/employees. The implementation of this system is still in its genesis

Other important issues in the H-1B arena that employers need to know about include: (1) that CIS announced a review of its policy on H-1B cap exemptions for nonprofit entities that are related to or affiliated with institutions of higher education (examples include teaching hospitals that are affiliated with medical schools or organizations affiliated with nonprofit colleges or universities); and (2) that U.S. employers seeking to sponsor foreign nationals on H-1B, H-1B1 (Chile/Singapore), L-1 and O-1A visas must certify to compliance with Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).

For any additional information about the 2012 “H-1B season” please feel free to contact our offices at info@visaserve.com

The Nachman Phulwani Zimovcak (NPZ) Law Group P.C. is ready to assist you and your staff with your potential H-1B nonimmigrant professional and specialty occupation worker visa petition before the CIS (legacy INS) and with Consular Processing of H-1B visa cases anywhere in the world.

We can also assist you or your family members with any and all of your immigration law needs in the U.S., Canada and with regard to outbound transfers to select foreign countries.

If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact our offices at 201-670-0006 (x100) for David Nachman, Esq., (x124) for Michael Phulwani, Esq., and (x105) for Ludka Zimovcak, Esq.

We also have Canadian Lawyers on our staff to assist you with transfers to Canada and we have an affiliated office in Mumbai, India and a corresponding office in the Netherlands Antilles.

The January 6, 2012, DHS announcement about Planned Changes to Processing for Unlawful Presence Waivers.

By David H. Nachman

The January 6, 2012, DHS Announcement about Planned Changes to Processing for Unlawful Presence Waivers – Frequently Asked Questions

What was announced on January 6?

On January 6 DHS announced, in a notice to be published in the Federal Register on January 9 that it will be issuing new regulations for how unlawful presence waivers will be processed for certain immediate relatives who are filing immigrant visa applications abroad. Specifically, the new procedure will allow
these individuals to file for a provisional unlawful presence waiver and await
adjudication while in the U.S. If approved, they will still have to depart the U.S. to undergo visa processing and an interview at a U.S. consulate abroad. To receive a provisional waiver, they will still need to show that a lengthy bar from the U.S. would cause their U.S. citizen spouse or parent “extreme hardship.”

What is the current process and why is the change necessary?

Currently, many relatives of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents face unnecessary and dangerous bureaucratic hurdles when they apply for lawful permanent residence (“green card”). In order to be granted permanent residence, these applicants
are required to travel to a U.S. consulate in their home country to be interviewed and wait for the visa to be processed. But departure from the U.S. triggers a 3- or 10-year bar to re-entry for many applicants—specifically those who have been unlawfully present in the
U.S. for more than 180 days.

Individuals subject to this re-entry bar may apply for a waiver (using DHS Form I-601;see 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)(v)) so that they do not have to face years of separation from their family. To qualify, they must demonstrate that their U.S citizen or permanent
resident spouse or parent would experience “extreme hardship” if the waiver is not granted. But under the current process, the individual can only apply for the waiver in the home country, after having had an initial interview at the consulate. The decision on the waiver, which is made by USCIS even though the family member is abroad, often takes weeks, months or even years to be completed. Meanwhile, families are separated,
and the spouses and children of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents are forced to endure potentially dangerous situations in the home country until the waiver is granted
and they can return to the U.S. as lawful permanent residents.

Immigration law provides that U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents can apply for “green cards” for their foreign-born spouses and children. But the lengthy delays and risks in the current waiver procedure discourage many family members from completing
the process of legal immigration. Family members have been assaulted or killed while waiting for waivers to be reviewed.

What will the new process be?

The new procedure will allow certain immediate relatives—spouses, children and parents of adult of U.S. citizens—to apply for waivers of the unlawful presence bars while remaining in the U.S. If the individual is found eligible, USCIS will grant a provisional waiver. He or she will still have to depart the U.S. and visit a U.S. consulate abroad to apply for an immigrant visa. During the immigrant visa interview, the consular officer
will make the finding of inadmissibility based on unlawful presence and apply the provisional waiver. If other grounds of inadmissibility are found, the individual would need to submit another waiver application, if eligible, while abroad. In many cases, the provisional waiver will reduce the wait period abroad and the separation from the
applicant’s family by several months or years.

Individuals will still need to meet the extreme hardship standard established in existing law to obtain a waiver. The January 6 notice states that USCIS does not intend to modify the standard.

Who will be able to use the new process?

As announced in the January 6 notice, the new regulation will change the application process only for immediate relatives whose U.S. citizen spouse or parent would suffer extreme hardship if the bar is not waived.

Who is left out of the new process?

According to the January 6 notice, the new process will not apply to family members of lawful permanent resident petitioners. It will also not include immediate relatives if their qualifying relative for the hardship waiver is not a U.S. citizen spouse or parent. These
individuals will still need to apply under the existing procedure (departing the country first and applying for the waiver while abroad). There is no valid reason not to apply the same procedure to these individuals whose spouses and children face the same bureaucratic delays, obstacles and dangers when required to wait abroad for their waiver
adjudications.

The new procedure will apply only to individuals who are subject to the 3- and 10-year bars for unlawful presence. Individuals who are subject to other grounds of inadmissibility are not affected under the new process and will still have to depart the U.S. before applying for any waiver.

When will the new regulations and process be implemented?

The new provisional waiver procedure has not yet taken effect. The notice issued on January 6 announces the government’s intent to issue a proposed regulation at a future date. Next, DHS will issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that will include a
proposed regulation governing the waiver process and will invite public comment. The notice states that the new waiver process will not be implemented until a final rule is issued and the change becomes effective.

What should current and prospective waiver applicants do at this time?

The January 6 announcement has not changed anything in the current waiver procedure.

The notice discourages the filing of applications for provisional waivers and states that such requests will be rejected. The new procedure will not take effect until a final regulation is issued.

Once the new procedure takes effect, individuals with pending applications for unlawful presence waivers will not qualify under the new procedure.

What is the cost for applying for a waiver under the new procedure?

The January 6 announcement does not mention a change in the application fee for filing a waiver application (Form I-601). The current fee is $585.

How will the new procedure improve government efficiency?

Under the current procedure, waiver applications are filed by individuals who have departed the U.S. and are applying at U.S. consulates abroad. However, those waiver applications are not adjudicated by the U.S. consulate. Instead, they are forwarded to USCIS. Wait times for processing waivers can be months or years. Processing these applications in the U.S. will save government resources at the consulates and reduce the costs of shifting cases back and forth between government agencies.

David Nachman & Michael Phulwani discuss several immigration law issues on iTV.

Immigration 11/29/11 Part 1 (David H. Nachman and Michael Phulwani)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbTZV_9WNKg

Immigration 11/29/11 Part 2 (David H. Nachman and Michael Phulwani)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kaXVOR_O8I

Immigration 11/29/11 Part 3 (David H. Nachman and Michael Phulwani)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAicU6jAjks