<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business Immigration Law – Global, US, Canada &#187; site visit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.immigratelegallyblog.net/tag/site-visit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.immigratelegallyblog.net</link>
	<description>Visas, Green Cards, U.S. Immigration, Canadian Immigration and Visas, U.S. Employer Compliance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:36:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Update on the Broadgate Lawsuit &#8211; H-1B issues.</title>
		<link>http://www.immigratelegallyblog.net/2010/08/update-on-the-broadgate-lawsuit-h-1b-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.immigratelegallyblog.net/2010/08/update-on-the-broadgate-lawsuit-h-1b-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Visaserve.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fragomen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H-1B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memorandum.h-1B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neufeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shusterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site visit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suskind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work permit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.immigratelegallyblog.net/2010/08/update-on-the-broadgate-lawsuit-h-1b-issues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suit Challenging Employer-Employee/Third-Party Placement Memo (Updated 8/16/10) &#8211; On August 13, 2010, the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia dismissed with prejudice Broadgate, Inc.,et al v. USCIS, a case challenging the January 8, 2010, Neufeld employer-employee/third-party placement memo. The court concluded that the Memorandum does not constitute final agency action subject to judicial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suit Challenging Employer-Employee/Third-Party Placement Memo (Updated 8/16/10) &#8211; On August 13, 2010, the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia dismissed with prejudice Broadgate, Inc.,et al v. USCIS, a case challenging the January 8, 2010, Neufeld employer-employee/third-party placement memo. The court concluded that the Memorandum does not constitute final agency action subject to judicial review and the notice and comment requirements under the APA. The court concluded that the Memorandum establishes interpretive guidelines for the implementation of 8 C.F.R. § 214.2 and does not bind USCIS adjudicators in their determination of plaintiff’s H-1B visa applications. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.immigratelegallyblog.net/2010/08/update-on-the-broadgate-lawsuit-h-1b-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES RELEASE:</title>
		<link>http://www.immigratelegallyblog.net/2010/03/center-for-immigration-studies-release/</link>
		<comments>http://www.immigratelegallyblog.net/2010/03/center-for-immigration-studies-release/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Visaserve.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H-1B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neufeld memo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site visit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.immigratelegallyblog.net/2010/03/center-for-immigration-studies-release/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES RELEASE: USCIS Starting to Do the Right Thing on H-1B? Some Promising Signs.   
By David North, February 24, 2010
Sometimes it is hard to tell the significance of a government document just by reading it.
Sometimes the true impact becomes clear only when the activists speak out. A case in point: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES RELEASE: USCIS Starting to Do the Right Thing on H-1B? Some Promising Signs.   </p>
<p>By David North, February 24, 2010</p>
<p>Sometimes it is hard to tell the significance of a government document just by reading it.</p>
<p>Sometimes the true impact becomes clear only when the activists speak out. A case in point: the recent USCIS announcement regarding employer-employee relationships in the H-1B program.</p>
<p>When I first read the USCIS document with the eye-glazing title &#8220;Questions &#038; Answers: USCIS Issues Guidance Memorandum on Establishing the &#8216;Employee-Employer Relationship&#8217; in H-1B Petitions,&#8221; I was not particularly intrigued. The first question and answer confirmed my eyes&#8217;<br />
initial reaction:</p>
<p>    &#8220;Q: Does this memorandum change any of the requirements to establish eligibility for an H-1B petition?</p>
<p>    A: No. &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>But shortly thereafter the H-1B cheerleaders in the immigration bar started reacting.</p>
<p>At first, the reaction was pretty calm. Kate Kalmykov, with the New York and Philadelphia Klasko law firm, blogged:</p>
<p>    &#8230;If the H-1B worker will be employed at a &#8220;job shop&#8221;/third-party worksite where they will report to a manager of that third-party company and the petitioner will not retain control over the beneficiary&#8217;s [i.e., the H-1B's] work, the petition will be denied.</p>
<p>That, of course, is the point of the exercise; the new guidance continues to make it easy for employers to import H-1Bs to work at their own firms, but raises questions when the petitioning employers farm out their H-1Bs to other firms.</p>
<p>Soon the inspectors working at least two airports got the message from headquarters; apparently sensing a geographical disconnect among the airport used, the location of the petitioner, and the actual jobsite, they denied admission to some arriving H-1Bs. Here&#8217;s a report from a clearly upset immigration lawyer, Matthew Morse, that appeared in Immigration<br />
Daily:</p>
<p>    In some recent cases US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) inspecting officers have separated H-1B visa holders from other non-immigrants applying for admission into the United States on arriving at a port entry. Several of these H-1B visa holders were denied admission by CBP inspecting officers and placed on an aircraft to be returned to their home countries. Unfortunately, some of these H-1B visa holders were placed in expedited removal by CBP inspecting officers, rather than being permitted to withdraw their applications for admission, which resulted in these individuals potentially being barred from re-entering the United States for a five-year period. Such treatment has been reported at John F Kennedy International Airport, New York and Newark International Airport, New Jersey.</p>
<p>    This treatment of H-1B visa holders by CBP inspecting officers may be the result of a memorandum issued on January 8, 2010 by Donald Neufeld of US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).</p>
<p>Then, on February 18, the USCIS Office of Public Engagement held one of its &#8220;collaboration sessions&#8221; on the subject in Washington. I was not there, but a friend was, and he told me that Bruce Morrison, the former chair of the House Immigration Subcommittee (D-CT), was the first to speak. He told the gathering that he wrote the H-1B law. He was very concerned that the Neufeld memo would threaten what he, Morrison, called the &#8220;staffing model&#8221; which he claimed had a long and successful history.</p>
<p>By then, the significance of the USCIS memo was pretty clear.</p>
<p>Frankly, anything that limits the flows of H-1Bs into the U.S. labor market, whether they work directly for the petitioning employer or for someone else, is good news. For whatever reason, it looks like USCIS, on this narrow issue, is moving in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.immigratelegallyblog.net/2010/03/center-for-immigration-studies-release/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don’t Be Caught Off-Guard: H-1B Site Visits by the CIS are in Full Swing.</title>
		<link>http://www.immigratelegallyblog.net/2009/11/don%e2%80%99t-be-caught-off-guard-h-1b-site-visits-by-the-cis-are-in-full-swing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.immigratelegallyblog.net/2009/11/don%e2%80%99t-be-caught-off-guard-h-1b-site-visits-by-the-cis-are-in-full-swing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Visaserve.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H-1B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site visit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.immigratelegallyblog.net/2009/11/don%e2%80%99t-be-caught-off-guard-h-1b-site-visits-by-the-cis-are-in-full-swing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past few months, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Citizenship and Immigration Services (&#8221;CIS&#8221;) has conducted an investigation program aimed at visiting H-1B petitioner worksites throughout the U.S.  These site visits began as part of the CIS’ goal to decrease the number of H-1B violations and instances of fraud reported by the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the past few months, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Citizenship and Immigration Services (&#8221;CIS&#8221;) has conducted an investigation program aimed at visiting H-1B petitioner worksites throughout the U.S.  These site visits began as part of the CIS’ goal to decrease the number of H-1B violations and instances of fraud reported by the H-1B Benefit Fraud &#038; Compliance Assessment from CIS’ Office of Fraud Detection and National Security (“FDNS”), published this past September. </p>
<p>Why should employers care?  </p>
<p>Any employer who sponsored a foreign national worker for an H-1B visa can be subject to an unannounced site visit.  What this means is that an investigator can randomly show up at a worksite and demand to see a copy of the H-1B petition, interview the person who represented the company in connection with the H-1B as well as the H-1B employee.  Any inconsistencies found can mean big trouble for employers.<br />
Presently CIS has turned over the names of close to 40,000 companies across the US for investigative action via unannounced site visits.  </p>
<p>For more information about these H-1B site visits, as well as helpful tips to prepare employers for these visits, please click on our Firm&#8217;s website at www.visaserve.com. </p>
<p>Article:</p>
<p>For the past few months, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Citizenship and Immigration Services (&#8221;CIS&#8221;) has conducted an investigation program aimed at visiting H-1B petitioner worksites throughout the U.S.  These site visits began as part of the CIS’ goal to decrease the number of H-1B violations and instances of fraud reported by the H-1B Benefit Fraud &#038; Compliance Assessment from CIS’ Office of Fraud Detection and National Security (“FDNS”), published this past September.  According to the FDNS’ findings, as many as one in five H-1B applications were affected by either fraud or “technical violations” of the H-1B program. </p>
<p>Why should employers care?  </p>
<p>Any employer who sponsored a foreign national worker for an H-1B visa can be subject to an unannounced site visit.  What this means is that an investigator can randomly show up at a worksite and demand to see a copy of the H-1B petition, interview the person who represented the company in connection with the H-1B as well as the H-1B employee or other employees presently on site.  </p>
<p>Any inconsistencies found can mean big trouble for employers. FDNS has indicated that it does not need a subpoena in order to complete the site visit because USCIS regulations governing the filing of immigration petitions allow the government to take testimony and conduct broad investigations relating to the petitions.  </p>
<p>However other sources say that employers are not required to give in to the investigators’ demands without a subpoena.  </p>
<p>What to do?  </p>
<p>Our office recommends that you always comply as much as possible with any investigative agency that shows up at your door.  CIS has indicated that attorneys can be present during an inspection, but the investigator is not likely going to come back another day if the attorney is not available on the day of the unscheduled visit.  </p>
<p>Attorneys may be present via telephone in these circumstances.    </p>
<p>Some common questions that have been raised by employers include: “how are companies selected to be investigated,” “if I am visited, should I be concerned,” “what type of violations are the investigators looking for,” and “how can I prepare for a site visit from a CIS/FDNS investigator?”<br />
To address these issues in order, firstly any employer who has filed an H-1B petition can be subject to a site visit.  While CIS claims the employers are chosen at random, close to 40,000 employers’ names have been selected for site visits.  </p>
<p>Some factors that may have been taken into consideration when selecting these 40,000 employers include: companies with less than 15 employees; companies with less than $10 million in sales; companies less than 10 years old; accounting, HR, business analyst, sales and advertising positions; and petitions where the beneficiary merely had a bachelor’s degree, not an advanced degree.</p>
<p>If your company is visited and your records are in order, you have nothing to worry about.  Generally speaking employers are aware of inconsistencies before any investigative agency may catch wind of it. That being said, if the investigators uncover any inconsistencies or instances of fraud, the case may be referred to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), or the Department of Labor (DOL) for further investigation depending on the offense.  </p>
<p>This could mean there will be monetary, and if egregious offenses, possible criminal penalties for the employer.<br />
The objective of the unannounced on-site visits is clear: to detect fraud and abuses of the visa program. According to USCIS, the offenses range from technical violations to outright fraud, with the most common violation being the non-payment of a prevailing wage to the H-1B beneficiary.  </p>
<p>More specifically, the investigators may be looking for the following types of violations: job location not listed on the H-1B petition and/or LCA; H-1B worker not receiving the required wage; fraudulent H-1B documents or H-1B worker credentials; non-existent business or office location; job duties significantly different from those listed on H-1B petition/LCA; misrepresentation of H-1B status by the H-1B worker (e.g., had been terminated from previous H-1B position prior to new employer H-1B being filed); and H-1B worker paid the $1500 ACWIA fee.</p>
<p>How can you prepare yourself and your company for a possible site visit?  </p>
<p>Step one is to ensure that you have Public Access Files (PAF) for each H-1B worker, and that the PAF documents are accurate and up to date.  In general, it is a good idea to review and audit your H-1B/LCA records to make sure everything is in order and all information is readily available. Designate a specific individual at each H-1B worker location to meet the investigator should he/she arrive. </p>
<p>Prepare a quick list of facts about the company and also a listing of H-1B workers, work locations, title and salary information so you don’t need to search frantically for this information while the investigator is there. If you are not sure what a PAF is, or if you’d like to have your documents reviewed by legal counsel, you may contact our office at the number or e-mail below.  </p>
<p>About Nachman &#038; Associates, P.C. </p>
<p>The Business and Corporate Immigration Attorneys at our Firm have focused their practice, for over a decade and a half, on assisting companies that employ highly-skilled foreign nationals in visa applications. We serve our clients&#8217; business objectives. A natural extension of that service is counsel that helps the client to avoid the disruption and expense of ICE audits, recent CIS actions and the consequences of being found to be out of compliance with any number of regulations related to immigration and employment. </p>
<p>Our Business Immigration Attorneys can organize and conduct a review of records, assist in establishing procedures to reduce exposure to liability, and participate in training of managers to comply with the numerous requirements imposed by the US Department of Homeland Security.</p>
<p>Contact us for more information: Website: http://www.visaserve.com<br />
					      Phone: 201-670-0006</p>
<p>E-mail: info@visaserve.com </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.immigratelegallyblog.net/2009/11/don%e2%80%99t-be-caught-off-guard-h-1b-site-visits-by-the-cis-are-in-full-swing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
